Re: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit.

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Date: Sat Nov 03 2001 - 20:40:51 EST

Next message: Thomas Hood: "[PATCH] PnPBIOS patch #10"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux"
In reply to: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit."
Next in thread: Jakob Østergaard: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit."
Reply: Jakob Østergaard: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit."
Reply: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On November 2, 2001 03:20 am, Rusty Russell wrote:
> I agree with the "one file, one value" idea.

So cat /proc/partitions goes from being a nice, easy to read and use human
interface to something other than that. Lets not go overboard.

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Thomas Hood: "[PATCH] PnPBIOS patch #10"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux"
In reply to: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit."
Next in thread: Jakob Østergaard: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit."
Reply: Jakob Østergaard: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit."
Reply: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:22 EST