Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?

From: Ted Deppner (ted@psyber.com)
Date: Sun Nov 04 2001 - 02:15:03 EST

Next message: Ken Moffat: "Re: [PATCH] driver: ide-floppy.c kernel >=2.4.7"
Previous message: Dan Kegel: "Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?"
In reply to: Dan Kegel: "Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?"
Next in thread: Tahar: "Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?"
Reply: Tahar: "Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:03:17PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Would it be a Good Thing if Linus decided to make sure
> his kernels pass all of Alan's stress tests before
> releasing them? (I'm talking e.g. 2.4.14-final, not 2.4.14-preX.)

Yes it would. It would be a better idea if everyone (including you and
me) stress test those pre and final kernels too.

-- 
Ted Deppner
http://www.psyber.com/~ted/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ken Moffat: "Re: [PATCH] driver: ide-floppy.c kernel >=2.4.7"
Previous message: Dan Kegel: "Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?"
In reply to: Dan Kegel: "Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?"
Next in thread: Tahar: "Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?"
Reply: Tahar: "Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:22 EST