Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?

From: Heinz Diehl (hd@cavy.de)
Date: Sun Nov 04 2001 - 17:11:58 EST

Next message: Luigi Genoni: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
In reply to: f5ibh: "linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Next in thread: Alex Buell: "Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Reply: Alex Buell: "Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun Nov 04 2001, f5ibh wrote:

> Is 2.2.20 supposed to works when compiled with gcc-3.0.2 ?

No, use gcc 2.95.x

> It boots, but I have some missing symbols while loading some modules.
> The same config works fine with gcc-2.95.4

gcc-2.95.4 does not exist! The latest stable release is 2.95.3.

-- 
# Heinz Diehl, 68259 Mannheim, Germany
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Luigi Genoni: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
In reply to: f5ibh: "linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Next in thread: Alex Buell: "Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Reply: Alex Buell: "Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:24 EST