Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?

From: Alex Buell (alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk)
Date: Mon Nov 05 2001 - 04:58:28 EST

Next message: Martin Dalecki: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
Previous message: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel: "Re: [Ext2-devel] disk throughput"
In reply to: Stefan Smietanowski: "Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Next in thread: Ryan Sweet: "ip autoconfig and e100"
Reply: Ryan Sweet: "ip autoconfig and e100"
Reply: Stefan Smietanowski: "Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:

> Another word for it might be BETA...

Nope, it's release quality material.

-- Love like you've never been hurt. Dance like there's noone there.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin Dalecki: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
Previous message: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel: "Re: [Ext2-devel] disk throughput"
In reply to: Stefan Smietanowski: "Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Next in thread: Ryan Sweet: "ip autoconfig and e100"
Reply: Ryan Sweet: "ip autoconfig and e100"
Reply: Stefan Smietanowski: "Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:25 EST