Robert Love wrote:
>
> Further, the preemptible kernel patch oopses with this patch (IOW, don't
> use 2.4.13-ac8 + preempt-kernel, unless you remove all these bits like I
> did :>). I think it may be because of:
>
Could you send me an oops?
I assume that a
set_current(hard_get_current());
is missing somewhere.
The assumption is that get_current() is faster than hard_get_current(),
and that there are so many get_current() calls that the overhead for the
set_current() in __switch_to and do_page_fault is small.
> Manfred Spraul wrote:
> > error_code:
> > [...]
> > - GET_CURRENT(%ebx)
> > call *%edi
> > addl $8,%esp
> > + GET_CURRENT(%ebx)
> > The pointer to current was loaded into %ebx before the call to the error
> > handler, now that only happens after the call. As far as I can see the
> > load before the call is not required.
>
> this change but I am unsure. Would Manfred or someone knowledgeable in
> this mind letting me pick their brain?
>
I would be very surprised if that's a problem: the error handlers are C
functions, and they don't expect parameters in register %ebx.
-- Manfred - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:30 EST