Followup to: <20011106134234.A27718@redhat.com>
By author: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 09:49:15AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > That said, how expensive is loading %cr2 anyway? We can do all the same
> > tricks with a 16kB stack and just playing games with using the higher bits
> > as the "offset", ie things like
>
> Here are some numbers:
>
> read cr2 best: 11 av: 11.12
> write cr2 cr2 best: 61 av: 64.42
> read cr2 best: 11 av: 11.12
> write cr2 cr2 best: 61 av: 65.01
> read stk best: 10 av: 11.03
> write cr2 stk best: 61 av: 64.95
> read stk best: 10 av: 11.03
> write cr2 stk best: 61 av: 65.23
>
> Which come from insmod of the below two modules. I didn't test writing to
> the stack register, but I expect it's similarly expensive as it affects the
> call return stack and other behind the scenes dependancies. Suffice it to
> say that reading %cr2 is essentially free on my box (athlon mp). Maybe
> we should use it as a pointer into a per-cpu area to avoid writing it?
>
You still have to write it every time you take a page fault. You're
adding 60-odd cycles to the page fault path at least.
Not to mention any system which does microcoded reads of %cr2, which
apparently the Athlon XP doesn't.
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:31 EST