Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc

From: Erik Andersen (andersen@codepoet.org)
Date: Tue Nov 06 2001 - 17:28:26 EST

On Tue Nov 06, 2001 at 07:24:13PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> I really fail to see your point, it's trivial to make
> files which are easy to read by humans and also very
> easy to parse by shellscripts.
>
> PROCESSOR=0
> VENDOR_ID=GenuineIntel
> CPU_FAMILY=6
> MODEL=6
> MODEL_NAME="Celeron (Mendocino)"
> .....
>
> As you can see, this is easily readable by humans,
> while "parsing" by a shell script would be as follows:
>
> . /proc/cpuinfo
>
> After which you could just "echo $PROCESSOR" or
> something like that ...

I think we have a winner! If we could establish this
as policy that would be _sweet_!

 -Erik 

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:32 EST