Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc

From: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel (linux-kernel@alex.org.uk)
Date: Tue Nov 06 2001 - 19:40:52 EST

Next message: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel: "Re: PROBLEM: Linux updates RTC secretly when clock synchronizes"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Using %cr2 to reference "current""
In reply to: Martin Dalecki: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Next in thread: Ricky Beam: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

--On Wednesday, 07 November, 2001 1:13 AM +0100 Martin Dalecki
<dalecki@evision-ventures.com> wrote:

> around 6 years
> ago people did just give up on adapting the parsers to the ever chaning
> "wonderfull" ascii interfaces those times.

Must have passed me by - probably too busy with regedt32 and other
such great /proc substitutes - cough...

--
Alex Bligh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel: "Re: PROBLEM: Linux updates RTC secretly when clock synchronizes"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Using %cr2 to reference "current""
In reply to: Martin Dalecki: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Next in thread: Ricky Beam: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:33 EST