Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc

From: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel (linux-kernel@alex.org.uk)
Date: Tue Nov 06 2001 - 20:17:52 EST

Next message: Patrick Mau: "Recent thread abount the /proc files layout"
Previous message: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel: "Re: PROBLEM: Linux updates RTC secretly when clock synchronizes"
In reply to: Ricky Beam: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Next in thread: Martin Dalecki: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

--On Tuesday, 06 November, 2001 8:10 PM -0500 Ricky Beam
<jfbeam@bluetopia.net> wrote:

> /proc ... it's very handy; it's also very dangerous.

as is most of UID==0 UNIX; and the problem here is?

--
Alex Bligh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Patrick Mau: "Recent thread abount the /proc files layout"
Previous message: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel: "Re: PROBLEM: Linux updates RTC secretly when clock synchronizes"
In reply to: Ricky Beam: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Next in thread: Martin Dalecki: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:33 EST