Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc

From: Martin Dalecki (dalecki@evision-ventures.com)
Date: Wed Nov 07 2001 - 06:32:36 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Cannot unlock spinlock... Was: Problem in yenta.c, 2nd edition"
Previous message: George Greer: "keve-ntd (linux 2.2 and gcc 3 sillies)"
In reply to: Ricky Beam: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Next in thread: Paul P Komkoff Jr: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ricky Beam wrote:

> For an example of /proc done right, find a Solaris box. What do you find
> in /proc? Gee, process information. Only process information. In. Binary.

Amen. I have enough of them at hand. And I don't miss any "wonderfull"
functionality
from linux /proc if I'm working on them.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Cannot unlock spinlock... Was: Problem in yenta.c, 2nd edition"
Previous message: George Greer: "keve-ntd (linux 2.2 and gcc 3 sillies)"
In reply to: Ricky Beam: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Next in thread: Paul P Komkoff Jr: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:34 EST