Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup

From: Tim Schmielau (tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de)
Date: Wed Nov 07 2001 - 20:20:02 EST

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel."
Previous message: antirez: "Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel."
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>
> --- linux-2.4.14/net/ipv4/ipconfig.c Wed Oct 31 00:08:12 2001
> +++ linux-2.4.14-jiffies64/net/ipv4/ipconfig.c Wed Nov 7 23:28:47 2001
>
> These cases are indeed buggy. I'd rather fix these ones with
> time_{after,before}() though. And again, your "signed" casts
> are totally superfluous.
>

They actually are necessary as unsigned values can never become less than
zero.

Tim

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel."
Previous message: antirez: "Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel."
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:37 EST