Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?

• Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?"
• Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?"
• In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?"
• Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?"
• Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

   From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
   Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 06:45:40 +0100
   
   Sounds like you need a better hash function instead.
   
Andi, please think about the problem before jumping to conclusions.
N_PAGES / N_CHAINS > 1 in his situation. A better hash function
cannot help.

Franks a lot,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?"
• Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?"
• In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?"
• Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?"
• Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 15 2001 - 21:00:21 EST