In article <Pine.LNX.4.40.0111101516050.14500-100000@omega.hbh.net> you wrote:
> Hello !
> Anyone has an idea, why this ext3 "fails" at this specific test while on
> normal fs-benchmarks it is much better ?
ext3 by default imposes stricter ordering than the other journalling
filesystems in order to improve _data_ consistency (as opposed to just
the guarantee of consistent metadata as most other filesystems do).
if you mount the filesystem with
mount -t ext3 -o data=writeback /dev/foo /mnt/bar
will make it use the same level of guarantee as reiserfs does.
mount -t ext3 -o data=journal /dev/foo /mnt/bar
will do FULL data journalling and will also guarantee data integrety after a
crash...
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 15 2001 - 21:00:25 EST