Re: confused about raw-io blocksizes

From: Andreas Dilger (adilger@turbolabs.com)
Date: Sat Nov 10 2001 - 19:57:25 EST

Next message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH] take 2 of the tr-based current"
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: Bug in /proc/lvm/global (garbage printed)"
In reply to: Terje Eggestad: "Re: confused about raw-io blocksizes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Nov 10, 2001 12:55 +0100, Terje Eggestad wrote:
> > LVM is broken in this regard, unless you have a recent patch (Linus'
> > kernel does not). I sent him a patch to fix that, but it did not get in.
>
> I'm been trying with RH 2.4.2-2, stock 2.4.10, stock 2.4.13, and a RH
> 2.4.3 with some additional patches. All of them has lvm 0.9.1_beta2
> (isn't that getting old??)

Yes it is. You need a patch for LVM from the Sistina site, or -ac kernel.

Cheers, Andreas

-- Andreas Dilger http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/ http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH] take 2 of the tr-based current"
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: Bug in /proc/lvm/global (garbage printed)"
In reply to: Terje Eggestad: "Re: confused about raw-io blocksizes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 15 2001 - 21:00:25 EST