Re: [RFT] final cur of tr based current for -ac8

From: John Levon (moz@compsoc.man.ac.uk)
Date: Sat Nov 10 2001 - 20:48:02 EST

Next message: Anton Blanchard: "Re: [PATCH] take 2 of the tr-based current"
Previous message: Ralf Baechle: "Re: __builtin_* functions"
In reply to: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [RFT] final cur of tr based current for -ac8"
Next in thread: Mike Galbraith: "Re: [RFT] final cur of tr based current for -ac8"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 05:33:31PM -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:

> Thanks... I seem to have blotched the SMP side of things (again) which this
> might fix (including the symbol export from you). Also, Michael Barabanov
> came up with a patch using the same trick, although I haven't seen it.

You forgot -N option of diff :

Only in v2.4.13-ac8+tr.4/include/linux: per_cpu.h

Testing on my SMP box would be a bit awkward (not set up ppp/serial, so would have
to transfer patches from 2.4.5 by floppy ;) but if you need an SMP test done,
just shout.

On the UP box, the previous patch has now survived several hours under very heavy
NMI load, so I assume it's good.

thanks
john

-- 
"I know I believe in nothing but it is my nothing"
	- Manic Street Preachers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Anton Blanchard: "Re: [PATCH] take 2 of the tr-based current"
Previous message: Ralf Baechle: "Re: __builtin_* functions"
In reply to: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [RFT] final cur of tr based current for -ac8"
Next in thread: Mike Galbraith: "Re: [RFT] final cur of tr based current for -ac8"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 15 2001 - 21:00:25 EST