blocks or KB? (was: .. current meaning of blk_size array)

From: Peter T. Breuer (ptb@it.uc3m.es)
Date: Tue Nov 13 2001 - 13:51:29 EST


Let me put it more plainly. Martin Daleki + rumour assures me that the
blk_size array nowadays measure in blocks not KB, yet to me it seems that
it doesn't. Look at this code from ll_rw_blk.c in 2.4.13:

 unsigned long maxsector = (blk_size[major][MINOR(bh->b_rdev)] << 1) + 1;

and this comment:

 * blk_size contains the size of all block-devices in units of 1024
 * byte sectors:

so blk_size measures in KB. Where do I see it wrong? Is everybody
talking about 2.4.14 and 2.4.15? No .. it's just the same in 2.4.14:

 if (blk_size[major])
     minorsize = blk_size[major][MINOR(bh->b_rdev)];
     if (minorsize) {
        unsigned long maxsector = (minorsize << 1) + 1;

KB! Or is it the case that sectors don't mean 512B?

Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 15 2001 - 21:00:36 EST