Re: x bit for dirs: misfeature?

From: Albert D. Cahalan (acahalan@cs.uml.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 19 2001 - 19:38:39 EST


vda writes:

> I think "Whatta hell with this x bit meaning 'can browse'
> for dirs?! Who was that clever guy who invented that? Grrrr"
>
> Isn't r sufficient? Can we deprecate x for dirs?
> I.e. make it a mirror of r: you set r, you see x set,
> you clear r, you see x cleared, set/clear x = nop?

That won't fly, but maybe NFSv4 permissions will. Then at
least you could specify "search" or "traverse" permission,
neither of which will affect regular files.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:22 EST