kswapd goes up to 5-10% CPU (vs 3-6) but it finishes without issue or
apparent interactivity problems. I'm keeping it in while( 1 ), but it's
been predictable so far.
3-10 is a lot better than 99, but is kswapd really going to eat that
much CPU in an essentially allocation-less state?
But certainly you found the right thing.
Thx all!
-- Ken. brownfld@irridia.comOn Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 04:32:23AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: | On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 09:09:41PM -0600, Ken Brownfield wrote: | > Well, I think you'll be pleased to hear that your untested patch | > compiled, booted, _and_ fixed the problem. :) | | Can you try to run an updatedb constantly in background? | | Andrea | - | To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in | the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org | More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html | Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:22 EST