On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 20:54:43 +0100
Ricardo Galli <gallir@uib.es> wrote:
>
> > Does anybody have an idea why NAT in 2.4.10 wouldn't work like NAT in some
> > cheap dsl-router equipment regarding http-connections?
> > Is there any sense in upgrading to 2.4.15-preX?
> > I even tried some gateway software based on windoze that is able to NAT -
> and
> > it works too! I pretty much ran out of ideas...
>
> Did you disable ECN? (echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn)
Is 0. I didn't explicitely disable, it only happens to be so.
> Did you try a connection to port 80 from the Linux box?
Now this is interesting:
I try a simple telnet www.thedeadman.com 80 (I will post the publicly available
servers name if you want me to) and this is what happens:
not working: (connection fails)
2.0.39, some 2.2.18, 2.4.10, 2.4.13, some 2.2.19
working:
some 2.2.18, some 2.2.19, 2.4.5, 2.4.15-pre3, 2.4.15-pre7
?
Regards,
Stephan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:24 EST