Re: Swap vs No Swap.

From: Thomas S. Iversen (thomassi@dina.kvl.dk)
Date: Thu Nov 22 2001 - 12:37:35 EST

Next message: James A Sutherland: "Re: Swap vs No Swap."
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [PATCH] block_dev.c: fsync() on close() considered harmful"
In reply to: war: "Re: Swap vs No Swap."
Next in thread: Mike Galbraith: "Re: Swap vs No Swap."
Reply: Mike Galbraith: "Re: Swap vs No Swap."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> There is no need for swap if you have enough ram.

Turn it off. How hard can that be?

Thomas

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: James A Sutherland: "Re: Swap vs No Swap."
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [PATCH] block_dev.c: fsync() on close() considered harmful"
In reply to: war: "Re: Swap vs No Swap."
Next in thread: Mike Galbraith: "Re: Swap vs No Swap."
Reply: Mike Galbraith: "Re: Swap vs No Swap."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:30 EST