James A Sutherland wrote:
>>Obviously the problem is very much lessened, in my case, when
>>i put the swap partition on the *other* drive than the root fs.
>>Both are ATA100 (40GB 60GXPs), and the system is more responsive
>>with swap on hdc while / in on hda, than both on hda.
>>
>
> Hmm... if you've experimented with this, how does this setup compare to a
> striped RAID of hda+hdc used for root and swap? (i.e. is the speedup down to
> splitting accesses between two spindles?)
I haven't, but it's a good idea, I may give it a try, but not very soon.
François
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:31 EST