Cool,
do you happen top know where the patch is? On e that I can apply to
stock 2.4.1x??
TJ
tor, 2001-11-22 kl. 16:26 skrev Andi Kleen:
> Terje Eggestad <terje.eggestad@scali.no> writes:
>
> > ons, 2001-11-21 kl. 22:54 skrev Pavel Machek:
> > >
> > > On Mon 19-11-01 16:38:45, Terje Eggestad wrote:
> > > > subject says it all....
> > > >
> > > > I remember there was a discussion and a patch floating around that
> > > > implemented SYSCALL/SYSRET, just want to know what happened to it....
> > >
> > > discarded
> >
> > Because there was no perf benefit or because the patch was in poor
> > quality?
>
> The x86-64 port uses SYSCALL/SYSRET as the native call method for 64bit
> programs.
>
> Before x86-64 it turned out that SYSCALL is not really usable because
> of some builtin limitations (which are fixed in x86-64). This is only
> a problem for the K6, K7 should have support for SYSENTER/SYSEXIT (the
> Intel equivalent), which seems to be better designed. There is a patch
> to use SYSENTER/SYSEXIT.
>
>
> -Andi
-- _________________________________________________________________________Terje Eggestad terje.eggestad@scali.no Scali Scalable Linux Systems http://www.scali.com
Olaf Helsets Vei 6 tel: +47 22 62 89 61 (OFFICE) P.O.Box 70 Bogerud +47 975 31 574 (MOBILE) N-0621 Oslo fax: +47 22 62 89 51 NORWAY _________________________________________________________________________
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:33 EST