Re: Which gcc version?

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@zip.com.au)
Date: Fri Nov 23 2001 - 15:14:26 EST

Next message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Linux FSCP (Frequently Submitted Compilation Problems)? (was: Re: Loop.c File !!!!)"
Previous message: Ross Vandegrift: "Re: is 2.4.15 really available at www.kernel.org?"
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Which gcc version?"
Next in thread: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Which gcc version?"
Reply: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Which gcc version?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Daniel Phillips wrote:
>
> If there is a performance hit, it's not enough to worry about.

except egcs-1.1.2 (2.91.6) compiles stuff at almost twice the speed
of gcc3. The person who breaks egcs-1.1.2 for kernel builds owes
me a quad Xeon, thanks very much.

-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Linux FSCP (Frequently Submitted Compilation Problems)? (was: Re: Loop.c File !!!!)"
Previous message: Ross Vandegrift: "Re: is 2.4.15 really available at www.kernel.org?"
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Which gcc version?"
Next in thread: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Which gcc version?"
Reply: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Which gcc version?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:34 EST