On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, J Sloan wrote:
> This is all silly FUD - time for the pointer again -
>
> http://www.bero.org/gcc296.html
Redhat apologists are given the due they deserve.
Their first cut at a released 2.96 should never have made it out of the
labs alive, and for that matter, neither should have 7.0.
That said, the versions in 7.1, and the patches available have done
reasonably well for everything that I've tried to compile (kernels
included).
What are they going to do about gcc 3.0.x? It'll be amusing to watch.
-- -- John E. Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu) -- In theory, theory and practise are the same. In practise, they aren't.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:34 EST