Re: Linux 2.4.16-pre1

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon Nov 26 2001 - 11:55:17 EST


> so all complaints about how the VM change should have waited until 2.5/2.6
> ignore the fact that the existing VM system was broken.

Not paticularly. The original VM was fixable enough to branch 2.5, then
put the new VM in 2.5 and backport it without shipping two releases that
100% didnt actually work.

> more, don't gripe about the stable kernels not being perfect. It doesn't
> matter how many -rc kernels there are if most people wait until -final
> before doing their testing.

Thats why vendor kernels are generally a good idea for production setups.
Most vendors kernel trees have been beaten solidly for days with stress
testing and coverage test tools before they get put out
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:00:22 EST