Re: [PATCH] remove BKL from drivers' release functions

From: BALBIR SINGH (balbir.singh@wipro.com)
Date: Thu Nov 29 2001 - 08:55:55 EST


Even register_blkdev(), etc hold BKL, without these there will be
a lot of problems, all these need to be taken care of if BKL is
ever replaced.

Just adding what I know,
Balbir

Russell King wrote:

>On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 03:32:32PM -0800, David C. Hansen wrote:
>
>>Nothing, because the BKL is not held for all opens anymore. In most of
>>the cases that we addressed, the BKL was in release _only_, not in open
>>at all. There were quite a few drivers where we added a spinlock, or
>>used atomic operations to keep open from racing with release.
>>
>
>All char and block devs are opened with the BKL held - see chrdev_open in
>fs/devices.c and do_open in fs/block_dev.c
>
>--
>Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:00:34 EST