On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Donald Becker wrote:
> > of the change. We won't know for years if redesigning the kernel for
> > large scale SMP system is useful
> > - does it actually work,
> > - will big SMP machines be common, or even exist?
> > - will big SMP machines have the characteristics we predict
> > let alone worth the costs such as
> > - UP performance hit
> > - complexity increase slows other improvements
> > - difficult performance tuning
...
> No, I do not believe in 128 single CPU SMP machines but, if I've to watch
> inside my pretty dirty crystal ball, I see multi-core CPUs as a technology
> response to SMP request.
> Yes, because after the 1st theorem of "work" there's the 1st lemma of
> technology that states that "technology will always follow the
> market request".
You haven't addressed the points above.
We haven't established that the market will request substantial numbers
of 128-way SMPs. Even if they do request single-address-space
multiprocessors, it's very likely that the result will be some form of cc-numa
where the structure will strongly influence the OS to treat the machine
as something besides a SMP.
To bring this branch back on point: we should distinguish between
design for an arbitrary and unpredictable goal (e.g. 128 way SMP)
vs. putting some design into things that we are supposed to already
understand
a SCSI device layer that isn't three half-finished clean-ups
a VFS layer that doesn't require the kernel to know a priori all of
the filesystem types that might be loaded
Donald Becker becker@scyld.com
Scyld Computing Corporation http://www.scyld.com
410 Severn Ave. Suite 210 Second Generation Beowulf Clusters
Annapolis MD 21403 410-990-9993
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 21:00:21 EST