Re: [PATCH] simple ide without proc compile fix

From: Robert Love (rml@tech9.net)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2001 - 00:08:01 EST


On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 23:48, David Weinehall wrote:

> Wouldn't a dummy, in case of no proc, be preferable? That'd make it
> possible to remove all the #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS

Yes, but like I said I'm just fixing a bug (by mimicking the other
code's behavior). It certainly is preferable to do what you say.

There is one issue, though. IDE code doesn't seem to have any common
header. With the function in multiple files, that complicates thing ...

        Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 21:00:32 EST