Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2001 - 04:40:19 EST

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Previous message: David Woodhouse: "Re: SMTP->Windows connection with 2.4.16"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Reply: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

davem@redhat.com said:
> > Why not __attribute__((weak)) ?
> This doesn't work on all platforms unfortunately :(

Doesn't work at all, or just doesn't work with the (current) minimum
recommended compiler? We have to increase those minima at some point.

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Previous message: David Woodhouse: "Re: SMTP->Windows connection with 2.4.16"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Reply: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 21:00:33 EST