Re: Would the father of init_mem_lth please stand up

From: Pete Zaitcev (zaitcev@redhat.com)
Date: Sat Dec 08 2001 - 11:32:00 EST


On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 12:47:05PM +0100, Eric Lammerts wrote:

> I agree it's ugly, but why would kfree be called on dangling pointers?
> All those pointers are initialized again on every sd_init() call. And
> there are no "goto cleanup_mem"s between the kmallocs.
>
> Eric

I was too rush - indeed there are no gotos between kmallocs.
So the scenario that I presented cannot happen.

-- Pete
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:12 EST