> I'd like to suggest again having patches include change logs. The basic
> idea is for a patch to contain a file like patch.foo in the top-level that
> includes the changelog entry and the maintainer runs a release script that
personally I think Marcelo is doing the right thing, which is actually
applying the needed patches rather than trying to do half of ISO9001
to keep a few people happy.
> them. This would make it much easier for people to know the details of
> what got fixed without further burdening The Maintainer.
If you are qualified to hack on the affected code you are able
to understand the one liner change summary
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:19 EST