Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
>I was just stating a fact of how they are stored on NTFS, again something
>I have no power to change.
But does NTFS specificism/cripplism belong in VFS? (I in no way blame
you for NTFS's design:-) )
>>Well, gosh, okay, maybe you want to prepend ',,' to streams and '..' to
>>extended attributes. I personally think Linux would only want to do so
>>when used as a fileserver emulating NTFS/SAMBA. There is no enhancement
>>of user functionality from doing it for general purpose filesystems.
>Just wait until this functionality is available and watch all GUI things
>start to use it en masse! I don't doubt that GNOME/KDE/replace with your
>favourite window manager are going to hesitate to start putting in the
>icon, the name, and whatnot inside EAs or inside named streams the instant
>they are ubiquitously available and I think that makes a lot of sense too.
>No doubt I will get flamed for saying this but all flames go to
>Both MacOS and as of recently Windows do this kind of stuff, too, and it
>can't be long before Linux goes the same way, provided file systems
>support the required features (i.e. EAs and/or named streams) so I
>disagree with you this is only a compatibility thing. It might start out
>as one but it will find real world applications very quickly...
I am not saying that the features of EAs are not useful, I am saying
that I want to choose them
individually for particular files.
It could be so much better to have EDIBLE_PIZZA (example from previous
instead of just PIZZA, sigh.
>>Programs will get written to use your API, and not work with reiserfs,
>>and will get written to use our API and not work with NTFS, and this is
>Now that is true. And yes, it is bad. However it will be up to the
>community to decide which API to use and at the moment there are several
>fs using the "bestbits" API and only reiserfs (?) the "reiserfs" one...
>And we all know from our very own $Deity that we don't design software, we
>just write things and let evolution decide which is better. (((-;
Fortunately he isn't entirely consistent on this point.:-)
I predict you guys will ship first and get a lot of usage, and then we
will ship later with more features,
and the result will be a mess for users. This is the usual evolutionary
design standards mess.
Objectively, I understand it is highly reasonable for the Linux
community to assume that what we
implement will be horrible until we finish it. I would encourage it to
assume that someone else
will eventually get orthogonalism right though, and I think it would be
worth waiting for it, because
these are the sorts of design features that stick around for 30 years.
I don't really expect that most
folks will choose to wait though.
Best to all,
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:22 EST