Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (fixed?)

From: Mike Galbraith (
Date: Fri Dec 14 2001 - 17:54:57 EST

On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Leigh Orf wrote:

> And in fact, after furthur playing around with the "fixed" version
> (moving shrink_[id]cache_memory to the top of vmscan.c::shrink_caches)
> I find that I still will get ENOMEM after updatedb occasionally. Less
> often than before, but it still happens.

Yes.. reasonable.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:29 EST