RE: Turning off nagle algorithm in 2.2.x and 2.4.x kernels?

From: Oliver Xymoron (oxymoron@waste.org)
Date: Tue Dec 18 2001 - 12:59:21 EST

Next message: degger@fhm.edu: "Re: Scheduler ( was: Just a second ) ..."
Previous message: Wenyong Deng: "How to use >3G memory per process"
In reply to: Ahmed, Zameer: "RE: Turning off nagle algorithm in 2.2.x and 2.4.x kernels?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Turning off nagle algorithm in 2.2.x and 2.4.x kernels?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Ahmed, Zameer wrote:

> The finicky nature of closed sourced sybase libraries that we are using in
> the custom apps make me ask this question. Will turning off the Nagle
> algorithm in the kernel on the fly, impact performance in any way? or Can we
> have this feature in the kernel in some way?

Nagle isn't there for looks, of course it will affect performance.

Considered LD_PRELOAD?

-- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: degger@fhm.edu: "Re: Scheduler ( was: Just a second ) ..."
Previous message: Wenyong Deng: "How to use >3G memory per process"
In reply to: Ahmed, Zameer: "RE: Turning off nagle algorithm in 2.2.x and 2.4.x kernels?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Turning off nagle algorithm in 2.2.x and 2.4.x kernels?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:17 EST