Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)

From: nbecker@fred.net
Date: Wed Dec 19 2001 - 13:39:20 EST

Next message: J Sloan: "Re: IRC (was: Scheduler)"
Previous message: Eli: "2.4.x WinBookXL mouse & keyboard freeze"
In reply to: M. R. Brown: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
Next in thread: M. R. Brown: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
Reply: M. R. Brown: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
Reply: Allan Sandfeld: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>>>>> "M" == M R Brown <mrbrown@0xd6.org> writes:

M> Curious, what happens when you compile using gcc 3.0.1 against
M> -march=athlon?

Is it safe to use gcc-3.0.2 to compile the kernel?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: J Sloan: "Re: IRC (was: Scheduler)"
Previous message: Eli: "2.4.x WinBookXL mouse & keyboard freeze"
In reply to: M. R. Brown: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
Next in thread: M. R. Brown: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
Reply: M. R. Brown: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
Reply: Allan Sandfeld: "Re: On K7, -march=k6 is good (Was Re: Why no -march=athlon?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:19 EST