Re: [PATCH] PCI updates - 32-bit IO support

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
Date: Wed Dec 19 2001 - 22:37:46 EST


Followup to: <20011218235024.N13126@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
By author: Russell King <rmk@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> I have here a system which requires 32-bit IO addressing on its PCI
> busses. Currently, Linux zeros the upper IO base/limit registers on
> all PCI bridges, which prevents addresses being forwarded on this
> system.
>
> The following patch the upper IO base/limit registers to be set
> appropriately by the PCI layer.
>
> This patch is being sent for review, and is targetted solely at 2.5.
>
> diff -ur orig/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c linux/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> --- orig/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c Sun Oct 14 20:53:14 2001
> +++ linux/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c Tue Dec 18 23:20:13 2001
> @@ -148,7 +181,10 @@
> pci_write_config_dword(bridge, PCI_IO_BASE, l);
>
> /* Clear upper 16 bits of I/O base/limit. */
> - pci_write_config_dword(bridge, PCI_IO_BASE_UPPER16, 0);
> + pci_write_config_word(bridge, PCI_IO_BASE_UPPER16,
> + ranges.io_start >> 16);
> + pci_write_config_word(bridge, PCI_IO_LIMIT_UPPER16,
> + ranges.io_end >> 16);
>

You probably need to verify that 32-bit support is available (both on
the bridge and the peripherals), but if they are, there's no reason
not to use it on non-x86 architectures...

        -hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<amsp@zytor.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:20 EST