Re: [RFC] Scheduler queue implementation ...

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Thu Dec 20 2001 - 14:36:30 EST


Hi!

> > Alan, you're mixing switch mm costs with cache image reload ones.
> > Note that equal mm does not mean matching cache image, at all.
>
> They are often close to the same thing. Take a look at the constraints
> on virtually cached processors like the ARM where they _are_ the same thing.
>
> Equal mm for cpu sucking tasks often means equal cache image. On the

Really?

I'd guess that if cpu-bound software wants to use clone(CLONE_VM) to
gain some performance, it should better work "mostly" in different
memory areas on different cpus... But I could be wrong.

                                                                Pavel

-- 
"I do not steal MS software. It is not worth it."
                                -- Pavel Kankovsky
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:23 EST