On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 09:56:40PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > actually while testing it I unfortunately found also an fs corruption
> > bug in the ->prepare_write/commit_write/writepage/direct_IO callbacks.
> > It's a longstanding one, since get_block born. In short, if get_block
> > fails while mapping on a certain page during
> > prepare_write/writepage/direct_IO (like it can happen with a full
> > filesystem, incidentally ext2 on /dev/ram0 during my testing that is
> > only 4M and so it overflows fast), the blocks before the ENOSPC failure
> > will be allocated, but the i_size won't be update accordingly (no commit
> > write, because prepare_write failed in the middle). for the
> > generic_file_write users it's easily fixable with an hack (truncating
> > backwards because we don't know how far we got allocating blocks when we
> > return from prepare_write), similar hack for the direct_IO one (that
> > commits only once at the end in function of the direct_IO generated).
> > But for writepage is quite a pain, infact I believe the writepage blocks
> > should be reserved in-core, to guarantee we will never fail a truncate
> > with ENOSPC. With the shared mappings we're effectively doing allocate
> > on flush... but with the lack of space reservation that makes it
> > unreliable :)
>
> The -ac kernels handled this by zeroing out the accidentally-allocated
> blocks at __block_prepare_write.
actually my fix seems cleaner because it puts the "clearing" in one single
place.
> > So for now I did an hack to cure the other two (writepage can still
> > corrupt the fs as said). I think the right fix (ala 2.5) is to change
> > the API so we can use the last blocks too, but the below will cure 2.4
> > and for writepage the right fix IMHO is to do the reservation of the
> > space.
>
> This is better in a way because it reclaims the eztra few blocks. But
> the -ac approach also works for writepage().
yes, it can solve the metadata corruption (assuming the locking is
right, I can as well call ->truncate within writepage but it's not
obvious at all that it won't race because we don't hold the i_sem within
writepage), but the data corruption still holds. I mean, there's no
failure path to notify userspace that a certain page fault is writing
into a page over an hole, that we don't have space to later allocate on
disk. so to me it sounds like MAP_SHARED should preallocate the space of
the holes so you will know that the writes into the MAP_SHARED segments
won't be lost (current state of things will lead to silent corruption
and pinned dirty pages in ram, aka broken allocate on flush like
previously said).
> Why was that code not brought across?
Who developed that code? Can the author of the code forward port it to
2.4.18pre and post a patch to the list so we can review? thanks,
Avoiding the matadata corruption would be a good start at least for 2.4,
then we should just focus on the writepage locking that could race with the
other "create=1" get_blocks. If it doesn't race I will certainly agree
on that approch for 2.4.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 31 2001 - 21:00:20 EST