Re: [patch] Re: Framebuffer...Why oh Why???

From: Timothy Covell (timothy.covell@ashavan.org)
Date: Sun Dec 30 2001 - 17:27:40 EST


On Sunday 30 December 2001 15:29, you wrote:
> Timothy Covell wrote:
> > When X11 locks up, I can still kill it and my box lives. When
> > framebuffers crash, their is no recovery save rebooting. Back in 1995
> > I thought that linux VTs and X11 implemenation blew Solaris out of the
> > water, and now we want throw away our progress? I'm still astounded
> > by the whole "oooh I can see a penquin while I boot-up" thing?
> > Granted, frame buffers have usage in embedded systems, but do they
> > really have to be so deeply integrated??
>
> Well that's news to me....
>
> If you can send me a simple step-by-step means by which to
> reproduce this, I'll take a shot at fixing it.

Andrew,

        Well, I was making reference to Solaris where I have seen
lots of X11 crashes mean framebuffer crashes which means the console
is unusable. I haven't played with it on Linux enough to know for sure that
Linux doesn't suffer the same problems. If that's true, then hats off to you
all for again showing how Solaris sucks.

-- 
timothy.covell@ashavan.org.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 31 2001 - 21:00:23 EST