Re: [PATCH] kernel BUG at scsi_merge.c:83

From: Peter Osterlund (petero2@telia.com)
Date: Wed Jan 02 2002 - 06:23:37 EST


Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 02 2002, Peter Osterlund wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > While doing some stress testing on the 2.5.2-pre5 kernel, I am hitting
> > a kernel BUG at scsi_merge.c:83, followed by a kernel panic. The
> > problem is that scsi_alloc_sgtable fails because the request contains
> > too many physical segments. I think this patch is the correct fix:
>
> Correct, ll_rw_blk default is ok now. I missed this when killing
> scsi_malloc/scsi_dma, thanks.

It turns out this is still not enough to fix the problem for me,
because ll_new_hw_segment is still allowing nr_phys_segments to become
too large. Is the following patch the correct way to deal with this
problem, or is that case supposed to be prevented by some other means?
At least, this patch prevents the kernel panic during my stress test.

--- linux-2.5.2-pre5/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c Mon Dec 31 14:56:37 2001
+++ linux-2.5-packet/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c Wed Jan 2 11:44:21 2002
@@ -530,6 +530,7 @@
                                     struct bio *bio)
 {
         int nr_hw_segs = bio_hw_segments(q, bio);
+ int nr_phys_segs;
 
         if (req->nr_hw_segments + nr_hw_segs > q->max_hw_segments) {
                 req->flags |= REQ_NOMERGE;
@@ -537,12 +538,19 @@
                 return 0;
         }
 
+ nr_phys_segs = bio_phys_segments(q, bio);
+ if (req->nr_phys_segments + nr_phys_segs > q->max_phys_segments) {
+ req->flags |= REQ_NOMERGE;
+ q->last_merge = NULL;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
         /*
          * This will form the start of a new hw segment. Bump both
          * counters.
          */
         req->nr_hw_segments += nr_hw_segs;
- req->nr_phys_segments += bio_phys_segments(q, bio);
+ req->nr_phys_segments += nr_phys_segs;
         return 1;
 }
 

-- 
Peter Osterlund - petero2@telia.com
http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:16 EST