Re: [CFT] [JANITORIAL] Unbork fs.h

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@ns.caldera.de)
Date: Thu Jan 03 2002 - 10:45:55 EST

Next message: Edgar Toernig: "Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix"
Previous message: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [Fwd: i810_audio]"
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "[CFT] [JANITORIAL] Unbork fs.h"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [CFT] [JANITORIAL] Unbork fs.h"
Reply: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [CFT] [JANITORIAL] Unbork fs.h"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: [CFT] [JANITORIAL] Unbork fs.h"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <E16M7Gz-00015E-00@starship.berlin> you wrote:
> - inode = get_empty_inode();
> + inode = get_empty_inode(sb);

How about killing get_empty_inode completly and using new_inode() instead?
There should be no regularly allocated inode without a superblock.

Christoph

-- 
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Edgar Toernig: "Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix"
Previous message: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [Fwd: i810_audio]"
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "[CFT] [JANITORIAL] Unbork fs.h"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [CFT] [JANITORIAL] Unbork fs.h"
Reply: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [CFT] [JANITORIAL] Unbork fs.h"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: [CFT] [JANITORIAL] Unbork fs.h"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:21 EST