On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Alex wrote:
>
> > Maybe the best thing would be to supply the kernel a "large" _textfile_
> > with all the hardware the user definitely has (at such-and such
> > irq/dma/io); the textfile could be the output resilt from a
> > "userfriendly" hardware-detection tool that lists all categories of
> > hardwares etc. and has - generally - a large hardware database.
>
> Think about ancient hardware (Yes theres lots of it still in use)
> These beasts had jumpers to set IRQ/DMA etc, and this was not detectable
> from software until PNPISA arrived on the scene.
>
> You're still going to need user interaction for a lot of these.
That is why I recommended that the textfile is the output of an
interactive hardware-detection tool. Yes, interactive. :-)
> "But Microsoft doesn't" isn't an argument any more either, they dropped
> support for really ancient hardware a long time ago.
Show them that we can do better. :-D
Alex
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:24 EST