On Fridayen den 4 January 2002 12.42, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Dieter [iso-8859-15] Nützel wrote:
> > What next? Maybe a combination of O(1) and preempt?
>
> yes, fast preemption of kernel-mode tasks and the scheduler code are
> almost orthogonal. So i agree that to get the best interactive performance
> we need both.
>
> Ingo
>
> ps. i'm working on fixing the crashes you saw.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Ingo,
The preemtion kernel adds protection to per process data...
And it is not (yet) updated to handle the O(1) scheduler!
/RogerL
-- Roger Larsson Skellefteå Sweden - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:27 EST