Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Clean up fs.h union for ext2

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Date: Sat Jan 05 2002 - 09:47:02 EST

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [CFT] Unbork fs.h + per-fs supers -> dontuse"
Previous message: kumar M: "Re: Problems in exporting symbols"
In reply to: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Clean up fs.h union for ext2"
Next in thread: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Clean up fs.h union for ext2"
Reply: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Clean up fs.h union for ext2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On January 5, 2002 03:29 pm, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> If anyone wants a look NTFS TNG already has gone all the way (for a while
> now in fact). Both fs inode and super block are fs internal slab caches and
> both use static inline NTFS_I / NTFS_SB functions and the ntfs includes
> from linux/fs.h are removed altogether. Code is in sourceforge cvs. For
> instructions how to download the code or to browse it online, see:

Nice, did you use the generic_ip fields?

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [CFT] Unbork fs.h + per-fs supers -> dontuse"
Previous message: kumar M: "Re: Problems in exporting symbols"
In reply to: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Clean up fs.h union for ext2"
Next in thread: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Clean up fs.h union for ext2"
Reply: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Clean up fs.h union for ext2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:28 EST