On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 11:52:21AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
> Please don't take it bad, I don't want to flame you nor anybody, but I
> think that if everyone publicly announces his own tree with his own set
> of changes against the main kernel, many users will be lost quickly.
My worry is that l-k will now house discussions of 2.0, 2.2, 2.4,
2.5, aa, dnj, et al...
I care very little for discussion of all the kernel varients other
than those that I am interested in.
In fact, I really could care less about any dicussion other than
2.2 and 2.4. However, I have to wade through all the discussion
of the other versions to get to what I want. Often there is nothing
in emails that idenfity what versions the other is talking about.
And now with the flood of new kernel trees, the info I am
particularly interested in is going to be even further buried.
Since the powers that be are utterly against breaking l-k into
topical subgroups, how about the various "versions" including something
that I can use to identify and toss those messages I am not
interested in.
I'm primarily a 2.4 user, why do I care about all this 2.5 discussion?
-- Brian Litzinger <brian@worldcontrol.com>Copyright (c) 2002 By Brian Litzinger, All Rights Reserved - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:30 EST