> Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
>
>
> I did some tests with different VM-patches. I tested one ac-patch, too.
> I detected the same as you described - but the memory-consumption and
> the behaviour at all isn't better. If you want to, you can test another
> patch, which worked best in my test. It's nearly as good as kernel
> 2.2.x. Ask M.H.vanLeeuwen (vanl@megsinet.net) for his oom-patch to
> kernel 2.4.17.
> But beware: maybe this strategy doesn't fit to your applications. And
> it's not for productive use.
> I and some others surely too, would be interested in your experience
> with this patch.
>
Hi,
so I took the M.H.vL vmscan.c patch for 2.4.17 and it is a definite
winner for me. Sounds like 2.4.18 material.
Martin
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch | email: Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de TeraPort GmbH | Phone: +49-89-510857-309 C+ITS | Fax: +49-89-510857-111 http://www.teraport.de | Mobile: +49-170-4904759 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:35 EST