On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Richard Gooch wrote:
> It still eludes me why a new device FS was developed when devfs
> already has the mechanisms that are needed.
For one, driverfs can be made mandatory. Sure we could do the same for
devfs, but there are probably an army of people who don't want
a mandatory devfs.
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:36 EST