* Eric S. Raymond (esr@thyrsus.com) wrote:
> CPU_ARM922_D_CACHE_ON
> CPU_ARM922_I_CACHE_ON
> CPU_ARM922_WRITETHROUGH
Hmm - is there anything ARM922 specific about these - i.e. is there a
reason that we shouldn't get rid of them and have some architecture
independent symbols CPU_D_CACHE_ON, CPU_I_CACHE_ON and
CPU_CACHE_WRITETHROUGH (and more to your taste) and then architectures
can use the ones which apply to them.
Doesn't seem to be a point in having dupes.
Dave
---------------- Have a happy GNU millennium! ----------------------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM, SPARC and HP-PA | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:23 EST