On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 15:18, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Instead, a decision needs to be made: "Linux will henceforth be a
> > low-latency kernel".
>
> I thought the intention was to make it a config option?
It was originally, it is now, and I intend it to be.
Further, since it uses the existing SMP locks, it doesn't introduce new
design decisions (the one being protection of implicitly locked per-CPU
data on preempt).
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:23 EST