Followup to: <p737kqpp60w.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de>
By author: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> One corner case where emulation would IMHO make sense would be CMPXCHG8.
> It would allow to do efficient inline mutexes in pthreads, and hit the
> emulation only on 386/486. cpu feature flag checking is unfortunately
> not an option normally for inline code.
>
You don't need CMPXCHG8B to do efficient inline mutexes. In fact, the
pthreads code for i386 uses the same mutexes the kernel does (LOCK INC
based, I believe), complete with section hacking to make them
efficiently inlinable -- and then they're put inside a function call.
I believe "kill me now" is an appropriate response.
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:38 EST